American
Bar Association Journal. "Case Note: Haig v. Agee." 67 (Sep. 1981): 1196.
Boston
College Law Review. "Clarifying the Authority Delegated to the Secretary of State for the Control of Passports: Haig v. Agee (101 S. Ct. 2766)." 24 (Mar. 1983): 435-467.
Brooklyn
Journal of International Law. "The Right to Travel and Passport Revocation: Haig v. Agee (101 S. Ct. 2766)." 8 (Summer 1982): 391-428.
California
Western International Law Journal. "Haig v. Agee (101 S. Ct. 2766): A Decisive Victory for Governmental Regulation of Americans in International Travel. 13 (Winter 1983): 144-167.
Connecticut
Law Review. "The CIA Responds to Its Black Sheep: Censorship and Passport Revocation -- the Cases of Philip Agee (Agee v. CIA, No.79-2788 (D.D.C.. Oct. 2, 1980); (Agee v. Muskie, 629 F.2d 80)." 13 (Winter 1981): 317-396.
Fagen, Leslie G. "The Right to Travel and the Loyalty Oath: Woodward v. Rogers (DDC 1972)." Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 12, no. 2 (1973): 387-400.
Surveys English and American common law and American case law in discussion of the Woodward v. Rogers right to travel case.
Farber,
Daniel A. "National Security, the Right to Travel, and the Court."
Supreme Court Review (1981): 263-290.
Gonzaga
Law Review. "Constitutional Law -- Passport Revocation on National Security Grounds -- the Secretary of State May Revoke a Passport when the Holder's Activities Abroad are Causing or Are Likely to Cause Serious Damage to National Security or Foreign Policy. Haig v. Agee, 101 S. Ct. 2766." 17 (1982): 485-497.
Harvard
International Law Journal. "Passport Controls: Revocation of Passports for National Security Reasons -- Haig v. Agee, 101 S. Ct. 2766." 23 (Spring 1982): 163- 170.
Harvard
Law Review. "Case note: Haig v. Agee." 95 (Nov. 1981): 201-211.
Hastings
Constitutional Law Quarterly. "The Public Forum Doctrine and Haig v. Agee (101 S. Ct. 2766)." 10 (Fall 1982): 187-212.
Minnesota
Law Review. "Authority of Secretary of State to Revoke Passports for National Security or Foreign Policy Reasons: Haig v. Agee (101 S. Ct. 2766)." 66 (Apr. 1982): 667-686.
North
Carolina Central Law Journal. "New Tension Between the Right to Travel Abroad and National Security Interests: the Passport Case, Haig v. Agee (101 S. Ct. 2766)." 13 (Spring 1982): 267-285.
Oklahoma
City University Law Review. "Limitations of the Right to Travel Abroad and the Implications on First Amendment Rights of the Individual: Haig v. Agee (101 S. Ct. 2766)." 8 (Fall 1983): 469-504.
Suffolk
Transnational Law Journal. "Passports -- Revocation -- Implicit Congressional Approval of Passport Revocation, Haig v. Agee, 101 S. Ct. 2766." 6 (Spring 1982): 197-207.
Taubitz, D.M. "Haig v. Agee (101 S. Ct. 2766): National Security Versus the Right to a Passport." Detroit College of Law Review (Winter 1982): 945-967.
Calder: "Concludes that Supreme Court decision to withhold Agee's passport was correct in view of national security implications."
Terry, Thomas M. "Administrative Law -- Passports May Not Be Revoked for National Security and Foreign Policy Reasons without Congressional Authorization (Agee v. Muskie)." Notre Dame Lawyer 56 (Feb. 1981): 508-514.
Texas
International Law Journal. "Passports -- Regulation Allowing Revocation of Passports for National Security or Foreign Policy Reasons Held Invalid. Agee v. Muskie, 629 F.2d 80." 16 (Winter 1981): 141-149.
University
of Florida Law Review. "Passport Revocation:
Balancing Constitutional Freedoms with National Security Concerns."
33 (Fall 1981): 763-776.
University
of Toledo Law Review. "National Security Interests vs. the First Amendment: Haig v. Agee (101 S. Ct. 2766)." 13 (Summer 1982): 1437-1467.
Western
New England Law Review. "Constitutional Law -- International Travel Restrictions & the First Amendment: To Speak or Not to Speak? Haig v. Agee (101 S. Ct. 2766)." 4 (Winter 1982): 449-478.
Yankelunas, Edward P. "The Power of the Executive to Restrict the International Travel of American Citizens on National Security and Foreign Policy Grounds." Buffalo Law Review 30, no. 4 (Fall 1981): 781-814.
Calder: Includes discussion of Zemel v. Rusk and Haig v. Agee.
Return to Constitutional & Legal
Table of Contents
Return to Overviews Table of Contents