Adler, Mark S. "National Security Information Under the Amended Freedom of Information Act: Historical Perspectives and Analysis." Hofstra Law Review 4, no. 3 (Spring 1976): 759-804. [Calder]See: Central Intelligence Agency Information Act. Pub. L. 98-477, Oct 15, 1984; 98 Stat. 2209; 5 U.S.C. (section) 552a, 50 U.S.C. (sections) 431, 432.
Adler, Mark S. "National Security Information Under the Amended Freedom of Information Act: Historical Perspectives and Analysis." Hofstra Law Review 4, no. 3 (Spring 1976): 759-804. [Calder]
Aitchison,
Danae J. "Reining in the Glomar Response: Reducing CIA Abuse of the
Freedom of Information Act." U.C. Davis Law Review 27 (Fall
1993): 219-254.
Clark comment: The "Glomar Response" is "We can neither confirm nor deny."
American Bar Association.
Standing Committee on Law and National Security. "Congress Considers
Amendments to Freedom of Information Act." Intelligence Report
3, no. 8 (1981): 1-4.
Petersen: "CIA Exemptions."
American Bar Association.
Standing Committee on Law and National Security. "First Circuit Applies
CIA Information Act." National Security Law Report 15, no. 9
(Sep. 1993): 1, 4.
Sullivan v. Central Intelligence Agency, 992 F.2d 1249 (1st Cir. 1993). "The statute also played a minor role in an earlier case, Hunt v. Central Intelligence Agency, 981 F.2d 1116 (9th Cir. 1992)" [fn. 1]. The classified information being sought "remains protected."
American Bar Association.
Standing Committee on Law and National Security. "Testimony on FOIA
Presented by AFIO and ACLU Representatives." Intelligence Report
3, no. 9 (1981): 1-4. [Petersen]
Bell, June B. “Invisible-ink Formula Stays Invisible.” National Law Journal 24, no. 26 (4 Mar. 2002).
“U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson [has] rejected a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request [from the James Madison Project] for 16 pages of documents on how to create and detect invisible ink.” The documents being sought from the CIA “were produced between 1917 and 1930. Attorneys representing the CIA … argued that though secret ink may seem an unsophisticated espionage technique compared to 21st-century encryption, it could nonetheless be valuable to America's foes.” [James Madison Project v. National Archives & Records Administration, No. 98-2737 (D.D.C.).]
Center for National
Security Studies. The CIA and the Freedom of Information Act: A Report
on the Proposals for an Exemption. CNSS Report 106. Washington, DC:
1980. [Petersen]
Cole,
Patrick E. "The Freedom of Information Act and the Central Intelligence
Agency's Paper Chase: A Need for Congressional Action to Maintain Essential
Secrecy for Intelligence Files while Preserving the Public's Right to Know."
Notre Dame Law Review 58 (Dec. 1982): 350-381.
D'Amato,
Alfonse M., and Antonia M. Greenman. "The Freedom of Information Act
and the CIA: How S. 1235 Will Enhance Our Nation's Security." Journal
of Legislation 9 (Summer 1982): 179-193.
Glennon,
Michael J. "Congressional Access to Classified Information." Berkeley
Journal of International Law 16 (1998): 126-137.
Hunt v. CIA,
No. 92-16548, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth
Circuit, 30 Dec. 1992.
Click for the summary of opinion in this FOIA case.
Minnesota
Law Review. "FOIA Exemption 3 and
the CIA: An Approach to End the Confusion and Controversy." 68 (Jun.
1984): 1231-1263.
Toran, Janice. "Secrecy
Orders and Government Litigants: 'A Northwset Passage Around the Freedom
of Information Act.'" Georgia Law Review 27 (Fall 1992): 121-182.
[Calder]
University
of Cincinnati Law Review. "Administrative
Law -- Freedom of Information Act -- an agency's unpublished time of request
cutoff date for searching its files for records requested under the Freedom
of Information Act is invalid as unreasonable unless exceptional circumstances
are shown; all records in an agency's possession, whether created by the
agency itself or by another agency, are 'agency records' -- McGehee v. Central
Intelligence Agency, 697 F.2d 1095." 52 (1983): 921-935.
Washburn
Law Journal. "Freedom of Information Act: CIA's Right to Nondisclosure Broadened by Liberal Definition of Intelligence Source (CIA v. Sims, 105 S. Ct. 1881)." 25 (Spring 1986): 586-597.
Western
New England Law Review. "Administrative Law -- Defining the CIA's 'Intelligence Sources' as an Exception to the Freedom of Information Act -- CIA v. Sims, 105 S. Ct. 1881." 9 (1987): 333-360.
Winchester,
Karen A., and James W. Zirkle. "Freedom of Information and the CIA
Information Act." University of Richmond Law Review 21 (Winter
1987): 231-302.
Return to Constitutional & Legal
Table of Contents
Return to Overviews Table of Contents